I just got a sample DLR1060 radio in the mail today, and tested it against my DTR radios. I really like this radio, and I think it is an ideal choice for certain users. But it is not a DTR and doesn’t have all the DTR features. Plus, it may perform on par with DTRs but it still looks like a bubble-pack FRS radio.
Now that may not be an important consideration for some people, but for others, it does mean something. (Especially in environments where someone holding an official-looking walkie is seen to belong there.)
I am sharing some preliminary notes, and will add more as I learn more.
First, it uses a Motorola BP90 battery, rated at 1800 mah. For comparison, the standard DTR550 battery is 1200 mah, and the extended battery in the DTR650 is 1500 mah. (Any DTR radio can be upgraded to the extended 1500 mah battery.) The DLR1060 does not use an LCD screen with backlight; instead it uses one LED plus voice prompts. Battery life should be slightly better than the DTR but in my early tests, I am finding it a bit shorter than the DTR with the 1500 mah battery. Here are the battery life ratings from Motorola:
DLR 1800 mah battery = 14 hours
DTR 1200 mah battery = 14.5 hours
DTR 1500 mah battery = 19 hours
I see no reason to doubt these figures.
The CPS is no better. It is still confusing. Just prettier. (More on that below.)
The DLR meet military standard 810 C, D, E, F and G. It is protected from heat, cold, humidity, dust, shock and vibration. The DTR meets military standard 810 C, D, E and F. It is protected from all of the above PLUS rain. This means that the DTR is more protected from water splashes and rain than the newer DLR.
Range, surprisingly, is nearly identical to the DTR. On my usual range test course through a very dense urban neighborhood, I was able to raise a DTR sitting upright inside my car at about 15 city blocks away. The signal must make it through my car, my house, and another 15 blocks full of old homes and dense mature elm trees. That is an AMAZING performance for any two-way UHF radio! (Mind you, my DTR radios have always surprised me with their range capability.) The DLR has a fixed antenna, much like the DTR410. Compared to the DTR with the short quarter-wave replaceable antenna, there was only a few feet difference in range.
So, my rough city range numbers were as follows:
DTR410 with fixed stubby antenna = about 13 city blocks
DLR1060 with fixed stubby antenna = about 15 city blocks
DTR550 with 3 1/2" quarter-wave antenna = about 15 city blocks
DTR550 with 7" half-wave antenna = about 16 city blocks
Now, range estimations will vary widely from user to user, depending on what is between the two radios. Plus, two-way radios are VERY dependant on antenna height, so if one loses a signal while hooked to a belt, they can often regain it just by holding it above their head.
Now, the big issue for me is readability, clarity and signal strength. If I were to rate the DTRs as among the best in their class at 5 by 5, I would say the DLRs are at least 4 by 5. The DLR has a slightly smaller speaker and audio output of .75W, while the DTR has a more rugged and business-class speaker and 1W audio output. Both radios are 1W RF output. The DLR sounds just slightly more muffled than the DTR.
So, what’s not to like? Well, it took a lot of work to figure out how to program DLR radios to talk to an existing network of DTR radios. The DLR uses a new Profile ID system to check radios within range to ensure they are on the proper network (or “group” as Motorola refers to it as.) To talk to each other, all DTR and DLR radios must be on the same channel and the same ID number. The DTR radios use 10 channels, plus 100 group ID numbers. (Each ID number can only be used once, but that is a possible combination of over 950 “channels” to choose from.) The DLR radios come from the factory with preprogrammed channels, sbut can be reprogrammed with up to 18 channels and 10,000 Profile ID numbers.
The DTR can have as many as about 950 combinations, while the DLR can have about 200,000 combinations of unique channel/ID number. Out of the box, DLR radios will only communicate with DTR radios if they are both set to their factor defaults. Channel 1 on the DLR corresponds to Public Group 1 on the DTR, and so on.
To get DLR radios to communicate with an existing net of DTR radios that have already been custom-programmed takes a bit of work, plus the optional programming cable the the free Customer Programming Software from Motorola.
So, to sum up, if I were to score out of 5:
RANGE
DTR = 5
DLR = 5
CLARITY
DTR = 5
DLR = 4
BATTERY LIFE
DTR = 5
DLR = 4
RUGGEDNESS
DTR = 5
DLR = 4
COMPACTNESS
DTR = 4
DLR = 5
VALUE FOR MONEY
DTR = 4
DLR = 5
I love these new radios. I am not going to replace my fleet of DTRs with them, but they make a great addition. Plus, if I had no 900MHz frequency-hopping, licence-free radios, I would look closely at both the DTR and DLR line.